Show us the (Rosehill) Money!!
Just a reminder to Strategy Committee Members, we are still awaiting Fiona Ledden's report on the Rosehill Triangle Section 106 money.
For new Councillors you should be aware there has been dispute over how the Section 106 money for the above development was spent, with previous ward Councillors adamant that it should be spent in the Rosehill Area. As this is the only District Centre not mentioned in the Lib Dem 2006 manifesto it would be a good statement of intent if the total sum was re-invested in the area.
Assuming this goes to July Strategy, I hope there is an actual discussion at Strategy Committee on the lessons learned.
I will comment further when I see the report.
For new Councillors you should be aware there has been dispute over how the Section 106 money for the above development was spent, with previous ward Councillors adamant that it should be spent in the Rosehill Area. As this is the only District Centre not mentioned in the Lib Dem 2006 manifesto it would be a good statement of intent if the total sum was re-invested in the area.
Assuming this goes to July Strategy, I hope there is an actual discussion at Strategy Committee on the lessons learned.
I will comment further when I see the report.
posted by Charlie Mansell at 4:42 pm
2 Comments:
Charlie give Mike Broad a ring re. this. 8/1/2008
Fiona Ledden yeh she is the woman who went from Sutton and slotted into her husbands former area at the GLA (she is now at Brent BC 2010) - after the GLA he went to private firm - where he continued to advise on plannig S.106's - the same S.106's his wife sort advice from whilst at Sutton with a private firm - guess who - yeh hubby's employer. Nice little earner! Perhaps the Law Society and Standards would like the papwerwork....sweat on it Fiona,it's coming, when I feel like posting it.
Post a Comment
<< Home